Intel UHD Graphics 770 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 770 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Soutien API, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 770
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 ans 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 40% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1450 MHz versus 1033 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 23.20 GTexel/s versus 62.7 billion / sec
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 10 nm versus 28 nm
- 8.9x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 134 Watt
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 532 versus 465
- Environ 84% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.442 versus 25.21
- Environ 80% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1011.7 versus 561.43
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.846 versus 2.026
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 40.941 versus 30.868
- Environ 85% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 94.384 versus 51.009
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 4 Nov 2021 versus 26 March 2013 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1450 MHz versus 1033 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 23.20 GTexel/s versus 62.7 billion / sec |
| Processus de fabrication | 10 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 134 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 532 versus 465 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.442 versus 25.21 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1011.7 versus 561.43 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.846 versus 2.026 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.941 versus 30.868 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 94.384 versus 51.009 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- 3.3x plus de vitesse du noyau: 980 MHz versus 300 MHz
- 3x plus de pipelines: 768 versus 256
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3388 versus 1908
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 9482 versus 7628
- 15.4x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1106 versus 72
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 768 versus 256 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3388 versus 1908 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9482 versus 7628 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1106 versus 72 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 770
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 532 | 465 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1908 | 3388 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7628 | 9482 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.442 | 25.21 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1011.7 | 561.43 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.846 | 2.026 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.941 | 30.868 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 94.384 | 51.009 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 72 | 1106 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3426 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3642 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3242 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3426 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3642 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3242 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel UHD Graphics 770 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.2 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Alder Lake GT1 | GK106 |
| Date de sortie | 4 Nov 2021 | 26 March 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 832 | 810 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $169 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1450 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 32 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 185.6 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1485 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 742.4 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 256 | 768 |
| Pixel fill rate | 11.60 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 23.20 GTexel/s | 62.7 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 134 Watt |
| Noyaux CUDA | 768 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,585 gflops | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 97 °C | |
| Compte de transistor | 2,540 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Longeur | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | One 6-pin | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 144.2 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6.0 GB/s | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel UHD Graphics 770 avec des autres
IntelUHD Graphics 770 vs
NVIDIAQuadro4 380 XGL
IntelUHD Graphics 770 vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 7600
IntelUHD Graphics 770 vs
ATIFirePro 2260 PCI
IntelUHD Graphics 770 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 570X
IntelUHD Graphics 770 vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics 645
IntelUHD Graphics 770 vs
AMDRadeon Vega 9
