Intel UHD Graphics 770 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 770 and NVIDIA GeForce MX250 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 770

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• Around 40% higher boost clock speed: 1450 MHz vs 1038 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 14 nm
• 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 532 vs 240
• Around 89% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1011.7 vs 535.24
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.846 vs 2.64

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX250

• 3.1x more core clock speed: 937 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 50% higher pipelines: 384 vs 256
• Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 15 Watt
• Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2392 vs 1908
• Around 22% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9329 vs 7628
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.992 vs 46.442
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 44.7 vs 40.941
• Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 141.816 vs 94.384
• 12.3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 888 vs 72

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 770
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce MX250

PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	532 240
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1908 2392
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	7628 9329
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	46.442 46.992
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1011.7 535.24
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.846 2.64
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	40.941 44.7
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	94.384 141.816
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	72 888

Compare specifications (specs)