Intel UHD Graphics 770 vs NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 770 and NVIDIA Quadro M1000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

Intel UHD Graphics 770

NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 770

Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 2 month(s) later
Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 1450 MHz vs 1072 MHz
730x more texture fill rate: 23.20 GTexel/s vs 31.78 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 28 nm
2.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 40 Watt
Around 57% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 491 vs 313
Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.442 vs 38.33
Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1011.7 vs 721.18

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	4 Nov 2021 vs 18 August 2015
Boost clock speed	1450 MHz vs 1072 MHz
Texture fill rate	23.20 GTexel/s vs 31.78 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 40 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	491 vs 313
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	46.442 vs 38.33
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1011.7 vs 721.18

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

3.3x more core clock speed: 993 MHz vs 300 MHz
2x more pipelines: 512 vs 256
Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2874 vs 1858
Around 17% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8849 vs 7547
Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.056 vs 2.846
Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 42.938 vs 40.941
Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 137.786 vs 94.384
Around 35% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1002 vs 740

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	993 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines	512 vs 256
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	2874 vs 1858
Geekbench - OpenCL	8849 vs 7547
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.056 vs 2.846
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	42.938 vs 40.941
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	137.786 vs 94.384
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1002 vs 740

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 770
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

491

313

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1858

2874

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

7547

8849

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

46.442

38.33

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1011.7

721.18

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2.846

3.056

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

40.941

42.938

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

94.384

137.786

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

740

1002

Name	Intel UHD Graphics 770	NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
PassMark - G2D Mark	491	313
PassMark - G3D Mark	1858	2874
Geekbench - OpenCL	7547	8849
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	46.442	38.33
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1011.7	721.18
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.846	3.056
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	40.941	42.938
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	94.384	137.786
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	740	1002
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		4196
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		4196
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		3358

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel UHD Graphics 770	NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 12.2	Maxwell
Code name	Alder Lake GT1	GM107
Launch date	4 Nov 2021	18 August 2015
Place in performance rating	830	832
Type	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$200.89
Price now		$203.37
Value for money (0-100)		16.10
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1450 MHz	1072 MHz
Compute units	32
Core clock speed	300 MHz	993 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	185.6 GFLOPS (1:4)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	1485 GFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	742.4 GFLOPS
Pipelines	256	512
Pixel fill rate	11.60 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	23.20 GTexel/s	31.78 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	40 Watt
Floating-point performance		1,017 gflops
Transistor count		1,870 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port		1.2
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12
OpenCL	3.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.4	5.0
Vulkan
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface		MXM-A (3.0)
Laptop size		large
Supplementary power connectors		None
Memory
Maximum RAM amount		2 GB / 4 GB
Memory bandwidth		80 GB / s
Memory bus width		128 Bit
Memory clock speed		5012 MHz
Memory type		GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus