Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs NVIDIA GeForce 945M
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) and NVIDIA GeForce 945M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Technologies, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 1085 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 28 nm
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 75 Watt
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 28 May 2019 vs 27 October 2015 |
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 1085 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 3343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 3343 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 945M
- 3.4x more core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 16x more pipelines: 512 vs 32
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2961 vs 1887
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2961 vs 1887
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 3505
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 3505
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 512 vs 32 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2961 vs 1887 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2961 vs 1887 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 vs 3505 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 vs 3505 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 945M
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) | NVIDIA GeForce 945M |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1887 | 2961 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1887 | 2961 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3505 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3505 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3343 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2108 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 255 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8099 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.633 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 380.461 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.988 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.027 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.094 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) | NVIDIA GeForce 945M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Intel Gen. 11 (Ice Lake) | Maxwell |
| Code name | Ice Lake G1 Gen. 11 | GM107 |
| Launch date | 28 May 2019 | 27 October 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 884 | 952 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1085 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1029 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 32 | 512 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 953.9 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 29.81 GTexel / s | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Memory |
||
| Memory type | DDR4 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | Yes | 0 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) with others
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
NVIDIAGeForce 256 DDR
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
ATIMobility Radeon X700
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7950 GT
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
NVIDIAP106-090
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX250
