Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) versus NVIDIA GeForce 945M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) and NVIDIA GeForce 945M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 1% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1100 MHz versus 1085 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 10 nm versus 28 nm
- 3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 25 Watt versus 75 Watt
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 28 May 2019 versus 27 October 2015 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz versus 1085 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 10 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt versus 75 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 versus 3343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 versus 3343 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 945M
- 3.4x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1029 MHz versus 300 MHz
- 16x plus de pipelines: 512 versus 32
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2961 versus 1887
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2961 versus 1887
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 versus 3505
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 versus 3505
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1029 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 512 versus 32 |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2961 versus 1887 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2961 versus 1887 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 versus 3505 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 versus 3505 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 945M
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) | NVIDIA GeForce 945M |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1887 | 2961 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1887 | 2961 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3505 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3505 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3343 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2109 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 240 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8099 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.633 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 380.461 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.988 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.027 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.094 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) | NVIDIA GeForce 945M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Intel Gen. 11 (Ice Lake) | Maxwell |
| Nom de code | Ice Lake G1 Gen. 11 | GM107 |
| Date de sortie | 28 May 2019 | 27 October 2015 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 884 | 961 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz | 1085 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 1029 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 32 | 512 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Performance á point flottant | 953.9 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 29.81 GTexel / s | |
| Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Mémoire |
||
| Genre de mémoire | DDR4 | DDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | Yes | 0 |
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 16.02 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) avec des autres
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
NVIDIAGeForce 256 DDR
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
ATIMobility Radeon X700
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7950 GT
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
NVIDIAP106-090
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX250
