Intel UHD Graphics P630 vs AMD Radeon R7 350
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel UHD Graphics P630 und AMD Radeon R7 350 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel UHD Graphics P630
- 64x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 128 GB vs 2 GB
| Maximale Speichergröße | 128 GB vs 2 GB |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon R7 350
- 2.3x mehr Kerntaktfrequenz: 800 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 21.3x mehr Leitungssysteme: 512 vs 24
- Etwa 38% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7787 vs 5648
- Etwa 24% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.508 vs 20.49
- Etwa 67% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 647.813 vs 387.561
- Etwa 30% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.72 vs 2.089
- Etwa 80% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 44.6 vs 24.713
- 2.9x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 109.558 vs 37.743
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2072 vs 2010
- Etwa 37% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3122 vs 2273
- Etwa 11% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3019
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2072 vs 2010
- Etwa 37% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3122 vs 2273
- Etwa 11% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3019
| Spezifikationen | |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 800 MHz vs 350 MHz |
| Leitungssysteme | 512 vs 24 |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7787 vs 5648 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.508 vs 20.49 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 647.813 vs 387.561 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.72 vs 2.089 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.6 vs 24.713 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 109.558 vs 37.743 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2072 vs 2010 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3122 vs 2273 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3019 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2072 vs 2010 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3122 vs 2273 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3019 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics P630
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 350
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | AMD Radeon R7 350 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2075 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 333 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5648 | 7787 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.49 | 25.508 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 387.561 | 647.813 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.089 | 2.72 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.713 | 44.6 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 37.743 | 109.558 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2010 | 2072 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2273 | 3122 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3019 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2010 | 2072 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2273 | 3122 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3019 | 3358 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| Intel UHD Graphics P630 | AMD Radeon R7 350 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1082 | 1083 |
| Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
| Architektur | GCN 1.0 | |
| Codename | Cape Verde | |
| Startdatum | 6 July 2016 | |
Technische Info |
||
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1200 MHz | |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 350 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Leitungssysteme | 24 | 512 |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 819.2 gflops | |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | |
| Texturfüllrate | 25.6 GTexel / s | |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 55 Watt | |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 1,500 million | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale RAM-Belastung | 128 GB | 2 GB |
| Speicherbandbreite | 72 GB / s | |
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 128 Bit | |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 4500 MHz | |
| Speichertyp | GDDR5 | |
Technologien |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
| Display-Anschlüsse | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
| Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Länge | 168 mm | |
| Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | |

