Intel UHD Graphics P630 versus AMD Radeon R7 350
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics P630 and AMD Radeon R7 350 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics P630
- 64x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 128 GB versus 2 GB
Taille de mémore maximale | 128 GB versus 2 GB |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 350
- 2.3x plus de vitesse du noyau: 800 MHz versus 350 MHz
- 21.3x plus de pipelines: 512 versus 24
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 7787 versus 5648
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.508 versus 20.49
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 647.813 versus 387.561
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.72 versus 2.089
- Environ 80% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 44.6 versus 24.713
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 109.558 versus 37.743
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2072 versus 2010
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3122 versus 2273
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 3019
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2072 versus 2010
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3122 versus 2273
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 3019
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 800 MHz versus 350 MHz |
Pipelines | 512 versus 24 |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7787 versus 5648 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.508 versus 20.49 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 647.813 versus 387.561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.72 versus 2.089 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.6 versus 24.713 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 109.558 versus 37.743 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2072 versus 2010 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3122 versus 2273 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2072 versus 2010 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3122 versus 2273 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3019 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics P630
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 350
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | AMD Radeon R7 350 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2075 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 333 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5648 | 7787 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.49 | 25.508 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 387.561 | 647.813 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.089 | 2.72 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.713 | 44.6 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 37.743 | 109.558 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2010 | 2072 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2273 | 3122 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3019 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2010 | 2072 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2273 | 3122 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3019 | 3358 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel UHD Graphics P630 | AMD Radeon R7 350 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1082 | 1083 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | |
Nom de code | Cape Verde | |
Date de sortie | 6 July 2016 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz | 800 MHz |
Pipelines | 24 | 512 |
Performance á point flottant | 819.2 gflops | |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.6 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | |
Compte de transistor | 1,500 million | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 128 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 72 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4500 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Longeur | 168 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None |