Intel UHD Graphics P750 vs AMD Radeon R9 285

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics P750 and AMD Radeon R9 285 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics P750

• Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• 560.3x more texture fill rate: 57.60 GTexel/s vs 102.8 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 12.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 190 Watt

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 285

• 3.1x more core clock speed: 918 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 7x more pipelines: 1792 vs 256
• Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 597 vs 441
• 4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6680 vs 1671

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics P750
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 285

PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	441 597
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1671 6680

Compare specifications (specs)