Intel UHD Graphics P750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics P750 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics P750
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 270.4x more texture fill rate: 57.60 GTexel/s vs 213 billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 16.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 250 Watt
Launch date | 2021 vs 18 February 2014 |
Texture fill rate | 57.60 GTexel/s vs 213 billion / sec |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
- 3x more core clock speed: 889 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 980 MHz vs 900 MHz
- 11.3x more pipelines: 2880 vs 256
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 595 vs 452
- 5.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9039 vs 1728
- 3.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 26079 vs 6619
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 889 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 980 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Pipelines | 2880 vs 256 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 595 vs 452 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9039 vs 1728 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 26079 vs 6619 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics P750
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics P750 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 452 | 595 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1728 | 9039 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6619 | 26079 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 72.677 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1293.474 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.988 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 22.384 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 290.861 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8721 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3679 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8721 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3679 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3095 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics P750 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Kepler |
Code name | Rocket Lake GT1 | GK110B |
Launch date | 2021 | 18 February 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 445 | 441 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
Price now | $999.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 10.82 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 900 MHz | 980 MHz |
Compute units | 32 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 889 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 115.2 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 921.6 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 460.8 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 256 | 2880 |
Pixel fill rate | 28.80 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 57.60 GTexel/s | 213 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 250 Watt |
CUDA cores | 2880 | |
Floating-point performance | 5,645 gflops | |
Transistor count | 7,080 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | One 8-pin and one 6-pin | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 336 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 7.0 GB/s | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
TXAA |