Intel UHD Graphics (Tiger Lake 16 EU) vs AMD Radeon R9 285

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics (Tiger Lake 16 EU) and AMD Radeon R9 285 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

Intel UHD Graphics (Tiger Lake 16 EU)

AMD Radeon R9 285

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics (Tiger Lake 16 EU)

Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 6 month(s) later
112.8x more texture fill rate: 11.60 GTexel/s vs 102.8 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 28 nm
12.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 190 Watt

Launch date	2021 vs 2 September 2014
Texture fill rate	11.60 GTexel/s vs 102.8 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 190 Watt

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 285

2.6x more core clock speed: 918 MHz vs 350 MHz
14x more pipelines: 1792 vs 128

Core clock speed	918 MHz vs 350 MHz
Pipelines	1792 vs 128

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics (Tiger Lake 16 EU)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 285

Name	Intel UHD Graphics (Tiger Lake 16 EU)	AMD Radeon R9 285
PassMark - G3D Mark		6680
PassMark - G2D Mark		597
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		72.799
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1474.632
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		6.369
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		91.954
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		391.399
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		6474
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		3043
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		2782
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		6474
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		3043
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		2782
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		2778

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel UHD Graphics (Tiger Lake 16 EU)	AMD Radeon R9 285
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 12.1	GCN 3.0
Code name	Tiger Lake GT1	Tonga
Launch date	2021	2 September 2014
Place in performance rating	not rated	442
Design		AMD Radeon R9 200 Series
Launch price (MSRP)		$249
Type		Desktop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1450 MHz
Compute units	16
Core clock speed	350 MHz	918 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	172.8 GFLOPS (1:4)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	1382 GFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	691.2 GFLOPS
Pipelines	128	1792
Pixel fill rate	5.800 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	11.60 GTexel/s	102.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	190 Watt
Floating-point performance		3,290 gflops
Transistor count		5,000 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	Portable Device Dependent	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
VGA
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Form factor	IGP
Interface	Ring Bus	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length		221 mm
Supplementary power connectors		2x 6-pin
API support
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12
OpenCL	3.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.6
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	System Dependent	176.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	System Shared	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	5500 MHz
Memory type	System Shared	GDDR5
Technologies
HD3D
LiquidVR
TressFX
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)