Intel UHD Graphics vs AMD Radeon R5 M430
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics and AMD Radeon R5 M430 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 40% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 855 MHz
- Around 40% higher texture fill rate: 28.80 vs 20.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 23.007 vs 13.812
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 315.843 vs 144.604
- Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.342 vs 0.981
- Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.68 vs 18.55
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1490 vs 649
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 Aug 2019 vs 15 May 2016 |
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 855 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 28.80 vs 20.6 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.007 vs 13.812 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 315.843 vs 144.604 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.342 vs 0.981 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.68 vs 18.55 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1490 vs 649 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M430
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 320 vs 192
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 65.872 vs 28.708
- Around 83% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 516 vs 282
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 320 vs 192 |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 65.872 vs 28.708 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 516 vs 282 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 M430
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics | AMD Radeon R5 M430 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.007 | 13.812 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 315.843 | 144.604 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.342 | 0.981 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.68 | 18.55 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 28.708 | 65.872 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 282 | 516 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1490 | 649 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5010 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1087 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1157 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2212 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1087 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1157 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2212 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics | AMD Radeon R5 M430 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Comet Lake GT2 | Exo |
Launch date | 21 Aug 2019 | 15 May 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 1179 | 1182 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 855 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 192 | 320 |
Texture fill rate | 28.80 | 20.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Core clock speed | 1030 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 659.2 gflops | |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
DirectCompute 5.0 |