Intel UHD Graphics vs AMD Radeon R9 M265X

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics and AMD Radeon R9 M265X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 5 month(s) later
  • Around 92% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 625 MHz
  • Around 15% higher texture fill rate: 28.80 vs 25 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 23.007 vs 20.633
  • Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 277 vs 207
  • Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1484 vs 1133
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 21 Aug 2019 vs 21 March 2014
Boost clock speed 1200 MHz vs 625 MHz
Texture fill rate 28.80 vs 25 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 23.007 vs 20.633
PassMark - G2D Mark 277 vs 207
PassMark - G3D Mark 1484 vs 1133

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M265X

  • 3.3x more pipelines: 640 vs 192
  • Around 66% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 525.038 vs 315.843
  • Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.169 vs 1.342
  • Around 88% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 37.076 vs 19.68
  • 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 94.404 vs 28.708
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 640 vs 192
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 525.038 vs 315.843
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.169 vs 1.342
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 37.076 vs 19.68
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 94.404 vs 28.708

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M265X

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
23.007
20.633
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
315.843
525.038
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1.342
2.169
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19.68
37.076
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
28.708
94.404
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
277
207
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1484
1133
Name Intel UHD Graphics AMD Radeon R9 M265X
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 23.007 20.633
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 315.843 525.038
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.342 2.169
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 19.68 37.076
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 28.708 94.404
PassMark - G2D Mark 277 207
PassMark - G3D Mark 1484 1133
Geekbench - OpenCL 8843
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1972
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1765
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3214
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1972
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1765
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3214

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel UHD Graphics AMD Radeon R9 M265X

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.5 GCN 1.0
Code name Comet Lake GT2 Venus
Launch date 21 Aug 2019 21 March 2014
Place in performance rating 1194 1197
Type Desktop Desktop
Design AMD Radeon R9 200 Series

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1200 MHz 625 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 192 640
Texture fill rate 28.80 25 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt
Compute units 10
Core clock speed 575 MHz
Floating-point performance 800.0 gflops
Transistor count 1,500 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
Eyefinity

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus support PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12.1 11
OpenGL 4.6 4.4
Mantle
OpenCL Not Listed

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 72 GB/s
Memory bus width 128 bit
Memory clock speed 1125 MHz
Memory type GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

AMD Eyefinity
DualGraphics
FreeSync
HD3D
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
ZeroCore