Intel UHD Graphics vs AMD Radeon RX 550
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics and AMD Radeon RX 550 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1183 MHz
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
| Launch date | 21 Aug 2019 vs 18 April 2017 |
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 1183 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 550
- Around 31% higher texture fill rate: 37.86 GTexel / s vs 28.80
- 2.7x more pipelines: 512 vs 192
- Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 33.507 vs 22.935
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1037.305 vs 337.37
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.064 vs 1.338
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 52.533 vs 19.62
- 4.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 140.911 vs 29.757
- Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 476 vs 293
- Around 80% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2690 vs 1493
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 37.86 GTexel / s vs 28.80 |
| Pipelines | 512 vs 192 |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.507 vs 22.935 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1037.305 vs 337.37 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.064 vs 1.338 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.533 vs 19.62 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 140.911 vs 29.757 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 vs 293 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2690 vs 1493 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 550
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics | AMD Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.935 | 33.507 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 337.37 | 1037.305 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.338 | 3.064 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.62 | 52.533 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.757 | 140.911 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 293 | 476 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1493 | 2690 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11610 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4485 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 940 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2158 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4485 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 940 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2158 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 127 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel UHD Graphics | AMD Radeon RX 550 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | Comet Lake GT2 | Lexa |
| Launch date | 21 Aug 2019 | 18 April 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 1167 | 876 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
| GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $79 | |
| Price now | $75 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 59.51 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1183 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 192 | 512 |
| Texture fill rate | 28.80 | 37.86 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 1.2 TFLOPs | |
| Transistor count | 2,200 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Length | 145 mm | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||

