Intel UHD Graphics vs Intel HD Graphics 530

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics and Intel HD Graphics 530 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
  • Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1150 MHz
  • Around 14% higher texture fill rate: 28.80 vs 25.2 GTexel / s
  • 8x more pipelines: 192 vs 24
  • Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 337.37 vs 330.464
  • Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 293 vs 254
  • Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1493 vs 995
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 21 Aug 2019 vs 1 September 2015
Boost clock speed 1200 MHz vs 1150 MHz
Texture fill rate 28.80 vs 25.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines 192 vs 24
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 337.37 vs 330.464
PassMark - G2D Mark 293 vs 254
PassMark - G3D Mark 1493 vs 995

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 530

  • Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.747 vs 22.935
  • Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.804 vs 1.338
  • Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.781 vs 19.62
  • Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 30.177 vs 29.757
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 30.747 vs 22.935
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.804 vs 1.338
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 19.781 vs 19.62
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 30.177 vs 29.757

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 530

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
22.935
30.747
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
337.37
330.464
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1.338
1.804
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19.62
19.781
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
29.757
30.177
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
293
254
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1493
995
Name Intel UHD Graphics Intel HD Graphics 530
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 22.935 30.747
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 337.37 330.464
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.338 1.804
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 19.62 19.781
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 29.757 30.177
PassMark - G2D Mark 293 254
PassMark - G3D Mark 1493 995
Geekbench - OpenCL 4397
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1045
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2393
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1045
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2393
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3346
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 384

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel UHD Graphics Intel HD Graphics 530

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.5 Generation 9.0
Code name Comet Lake GT2 Skylake GT2
Launch date 21 Aug 2019 1 September 2015
Place in performance rating 1167 1248
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1200 MHz 1150 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 14 nm
Pipelines 192 24
Texture fill rate 28.80 25.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 15 Watt
Core clock speed 350 MHz
Floating-point performance 403.2 gflops
Transistor count 189 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 3.0 x1

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 64 GB
Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit
Memory type DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4
Shared memory 1