Intel UHD Graphics versus Intel HD Graphics 530
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics and Intel HD Graphics 530 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 4% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1200 MHz versus 1150 MHz
- Environ 14% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 28.80 versus 25.2 GTexel / s
- 8x plus de pipelines: 192 versus 24
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 337.37 versus 330.464
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 293 versus 254
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1493 versus 995
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 21 Aug 2019 versus 1 September 2015 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz versus 1150 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.80 versus 25.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 192 versus 24 |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 337.37 versus 330.464 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 293 versus 254 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1493 versus 995 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 530
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.747 versus 22.935
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.804 versus 1.338
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.781 versus 19.62
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 30.177 versus 29.757
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.747 versus 22.935 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.804 versus 1.338 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.781 versus 19.62 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.177 versus 29.757 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 530
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Nom | Intel UHD Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 530 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.935 | 30.747 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 337.37 | 330.464 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.338 | 1.804 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.62 | 19.781 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.757 | 30.177 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 293 | 254 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1493 | 995 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4397 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1045 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2393 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1045 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2393 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 384 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel UHD Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 530 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Generation 9.0 |
Nom de code | Comet Lake GT2 | Skylake GT2 |
Date de sortie | 21 Aug 2019 | 1 September 2015 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1167 | 1248 |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 192 | 24 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.80 | 25.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 403.2 gflops | |
Compte de transistor | 189 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 64 GB | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | |
Mémoire partagé | 1 |