Intel UHD Graphics vs NVIDIA GeForce 840M

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce 840M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

Intel UHD Graphics

NVIDIA GeForce 840M

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 5 month(s) later
Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1124 MHz
Around 60% higher texture fill rate: 28.80 vs 17.98 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
2.2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 33 Watt
2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 337.37 vs 162.594
Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.338 vs 1.237
Around 94% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 293 vs 151
Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1493 vs 1096

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	21 Aug 2019 vs 12 March 2014
Boost clock speed	1200 MHz vs 1124 MHz
Texture fill rate	28.80 vs 17.98 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 33 Watt
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	22.935 vs 22.848
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	337.37 vs 162.594
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.338 vs 1.237
PassMark - G2D Mark	293 vs 151
PassMark - G3D Mark	1493 vs 1096

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 840M

2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.15 vs 19.62
3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 95.545 vs 29.757

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	384 vs 192
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	21.15 vs 19.62
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	95.545 vs 29.757

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 840M

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

22.935

22.848

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

337.37

162.594

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1.338

1.237

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

19.62

21.15

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

29.757

95.545

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

293

151

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1493

1096

Name	Intel UHD Graphics	NVIDIA GeForce 840M
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	22.935	22.848
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	337.37	162.594
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.338	1.237
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	19.62	21.15
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	29.757	95.545
PassMark - G2D Mark	293	151
PassMark - G3D Mark	1493	1096
Geekbench - OpenCL		5771
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		2085
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		2736
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		3191
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		2085
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		2736
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		3191
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		503

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel UHD Graphics	NVIDIA GeForce 840M
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 9.5	Maxwell
Code name	Comet Lake GT2	GM108
Launch date	21 Aug 2019	12 March 2014
Place in performance rating	1167	1235
Type	Desktop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1200 MHz	1124 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	192	384
Texture fill rate	28.80	17.98 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	33 Watt
Core clock speed		1029 MHz
Floating-point performance		863.2 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus support		PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Memory
Maximum RAM amount		4 GB
Memory bandwidth		16.02 GB / s
Memory bus width		64 Bit
Memory clock speed		2002 MHz
Memory type		DDR3
Shared memory		0
Technologies
CUDA
GameWorks
GeForce Experience
GPU Boost
Optimus