NVIDIA CMP 50HX vs AMD Radeon Pro 575X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA CMP 50HX and AMD Radeon Pro 575X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA CMP 50HX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 2.1x more texture fill rate: 296.6 GTexel/s vs 140.3 GTexel/s
- Around 75% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 2048
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 2.5x more maximum memory size: 10 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 49% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 52254 vs 35017
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 24 Jun 2021 vs 18 March 2019 |
Texture fill rate | 296.6 GTexel/s vs 140.3 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 2048 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Maximum memory size | 10 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 52254 vs 35017 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 575X
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 250 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA CMP 50HX
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 575X
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA CMP 50HX | AMD Radeon Pro 575X |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 52254 | 35017 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11237 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11237 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3458 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3458 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA CMP 50HX | AMD Radeon Pro 575X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | TU102 | Polaris 20 |
Launch date | 24 Jun 2021 | 18 March 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 409 | 406 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1350 MHz | |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 3584 | 2048 |
Pixel fill rate | 123.6 GPixel/s | 35.07 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 296.6 GTexel/s | 140.3 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 120 Watt |
Transistor count | 18600 million | 5700 million |
Compute units | 32 | |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 280.6 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.489 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.489 TFLOPS | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Height | 35 mm, 1.4 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
Width | 116 mm, 4.6 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.3 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 10 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 560.0 GB/s | 217.6 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 320 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |