NVIDIA GRID K160Q vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5450

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID K160Q and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5450 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA GRID K160Q

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5450

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K160Q

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
Around 26% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 675 MHz
2.5x more texture fill rate: 13.6 GTexel / s vs 5.4 GTexel / s
2.4x more pipelines: 192 vs 80
3x better floating-point performance: 326.4 gflops vs 108 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 1782 MHz vs 1600 MHz
2.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 628 vs 214
8.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2654 vs 299
8.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2654 vs 299

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	28 June 2013 vs 7 January 2010
Core clock speed	850 MHz vs 675 MHz
Texture fill rate	13.6 GTexel / s vs 5.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines	192 vs 80
Floating-point performance	326.4 gflops vs 108 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Memory clock speed	1782 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	628 vs 214
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2654 vs 299
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2654 vs 299

Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5450

11.8x lower typical power consumption: 11 Watt vs 130 Watt
Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 320 vs 262

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	11 Watt vs 130 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	320 vs 262

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID K160Q
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5450

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

628

214

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

262

320

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2654

299

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2654

299

Name	NVIDIA GRID K160Q	ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5450
PassMark - G3D Mark	628	214
PassMark - G2D Mark	262	320
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1237
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1237
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1871
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1871
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2654	299
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2654	299

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GRID K160Q	ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5450
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler	TeraScale 2
Code name	GK107	Park
Launch date	28 June 2013	7 January 2010
Launch price (MSRP)	$125
Place in performance rating	1033	1036
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Technical info
Core clock speed	850 MHz	675 MHz
Floating-point performance	326.4 gflops	108 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	192	80
Texture fill rate	13.6 GTexel / s	5.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	130 Watt	11 Watt
Transistor count	1,270 million	292 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	11.2 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	28.51 GB / s	12.8 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1782 MHz	1600 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	DDR3
Shared memory		0