NVIDIA GRID K180Q vs AMD Radeon HD 6670
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID K180Q and AMD Radeon HD 6670 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K180Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 70% higher memory clock speed: 1782 MHz vs 1050 MHz
| Launch date | 28 June 2013 vs 19 April 2011 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6670
- Around 41% higher texture fill rate: 19.2 GTexel / s vs 13.6 GTexel / s
- 2.5x more pipelines: 480 vs 192
- 2.4x better floating-point performance: 768.0 gflops vs 326.4 gflops
- Around 97% lower typical power consumption: 66 Watt vs 130 Watt
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 725 vs 534
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 246 vs 113
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1564 vs 1201
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1564 vs 1201
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3260 vs 1744
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3260 vs 1744
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3348 vs 2688
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3348 vs 2688
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 19.2 GTexel / s vs 13.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 480 vs 192 |
| Floating-point performance | 768.0 gflops vs 326.4 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 66 Watt vs 130 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 725 vs 534 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 246 vs 113 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1564 vs 1201 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1564 vs 1201 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3260 vs 1744 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3260 vs 1744 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 vs 2688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 vs 2688 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID K180Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6670
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GRID K180Q | AMD Radeon HD 6670 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 534 | 725 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 113 | 246 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1201 | 1564 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1201 | 1564 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1744 | 3260 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1744 | 3260 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2688 | 3348 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2688 | 3348 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1902 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.861 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 235.463 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.463 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.918 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 38.551 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GRID K180Q | AMD Radeon HD 6670 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | GK107 | Turks |
| Launch date | 28 June 2013 | 19 April 2011 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $125 | $99 |
| Place in performance rating | 1257 | 1260 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
| Price now | $102.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 13.12 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | 768.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 192 | 480 |
| Texture fill rate | 13.6 GTexel / s | 19.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 66 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 716 million |
| Boost clock speed | 800 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Bus support | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Length | 168 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB / s | 64 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GRID K180Q with others
NVIDIAGRID K180Q vs
ATIRadeon 9000
NVIDIAGRID K180Q vs
AMDRadeon HD 6670
NVIDIAGRID K180Q vs
AMDRadeon HD 7620G IGP
NVIDIAGRID K180Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro K2000M
NVIDIAGRID K180Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce 840M
NVIDIAGRID K180Q vs
AMDRadeon R7 M260DX
