AMD Radeon Vega 3 vs NVIDIA GRID K180Q
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 3 and NVIDIA GRID K180Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 3
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 18% better floating-point performance: 384.0 gflops vs 326.4 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 8.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 130 Watt
- Around 67% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 890 vs 534
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 304 vs 113
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1412 vs 1201
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2111 vs 1744
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3174 vs 2688
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1412 vs 1201
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2111 vs 1744
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3174 vs 2688
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 February 2018 vs 28 June 2013 |
Floating-point performance | 384.0 gflops vs 326.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 130 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 890 vs 534 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 304 vs 113 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1412 vs 1201 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2111 vs 1744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3174 vs 2688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1412 vs 1201 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2111 vs 1744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3174 vs 2688 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K180Q
- 2.8x more core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 13% higher texture fill rate: 13.6 GTexel / s vs 12 GTexel / s
Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 13.6 GTexel / s vs 12 GTexel / s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 3
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID K180Q
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Vega 3 | NVIDIA GRID K180Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 890 | 534 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 304 | 113 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3950 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.049 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 183.156 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.75 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.933 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 60.006 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1412 | 1201 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2111 | 1744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3174 | 2688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1412 | 1201 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2111 | 1744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3174 | 2688 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 418 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Vega 3 | NVIDIA GRID K180Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Owl | GK107 |
Launch date | 13 February 2018 | 28 June 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1261 | 1264 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $125 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 850 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 384.0 gflops | 326.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 192 | 192 |
Texture fill rate | 12 GTexel / s | 13.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 130 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,940 million | 1,270 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory |
||
Memory type | System Shared | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | |
OpenGL | 4.6 |