NVIDIA GRID K180Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID K180Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K180Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 2% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 835 MHz
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1201 vs 1094
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1201 vs 1094
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 28 June 2013 vs 22 March 2012 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 835 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1201 vs 1094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1201 vs 1094 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M
- 2.2x more texture fill rate: 30.4 billion / sec vs 13.6 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
- 2.2x better floating-point performance: 729.6 gflops vs 326.4 gflops
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 130 Watt
- Around 12% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1782 MHz
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1454 vs 534
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 268 vs 113
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2253 vs 1744
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2253 vs 1744
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3176 vs 2688
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3176 vs 2688
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 30.4 billion / sec vs 13.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 192 |
Floating-point performance | 729.6 gflops vs 326.4 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 130 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 1782 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1454 vs 534 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 268 vs 113 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2253 vs 1744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2253 vs 1744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3176 vs 2688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3176 vs 2688 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID K180Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GRID K180Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 534 | 1454 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 113 | 268 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1201 | 1094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1201 | 1094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1744 | 2253 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1744 | 2253 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2688 | 3176 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2688 | 3176 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4041 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.837 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 405.086 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.098 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.798 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 33.754 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 475 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GRID K180Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Code name | GK107 | GK107 |
Launch date | 28 June 2013 | 22 March 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $125 | |
Place in performance rating | 1264 | 1267 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 835 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | 729.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 192 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 13.6 GTexel / s | 30.4 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,270 million |
Boost clock speed | 950 MHz | |
CUDA cores | 384 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB / s | 64.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128bit |
Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
FXAA | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |