NVIDIA GRID K180Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID K180Q and NVIDIA Quadro K2000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA GRID K180Q

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K180Q

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
Around 14% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 745 MHz

Launch date	28 June 2013 vs 1 June 2012
Core clock speed	850 MHz vs 745 MHz

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

Around 75% higher texture fill rate: 23.84 GTexel / s vs 13.6 GTexel / s
2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
Around 75% better floating-point performance: 572.2 gflops vs 326.4 gflops
2.4x lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 130 Watt
2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
Around 1% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1782 MHz
Around 90% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1012 vs 534
2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 255 vs 113
Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1726 vs 1201
Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1726 vs 1201
Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2207 vs 1744
Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2207 vs 1744
Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 2688
Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 2688

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	23.84 GTexel / s vs 13.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines	384 vs 192
Floating-point performance	572.2 gflops vs 326.4 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	55 Watt vs 130 Watt
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz vs 1782 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1012 vs 534
PassMark - G2D Mark	255 vs 113
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1726 vs 1201
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1726 vs 1201
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2207 vs 1744
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2207 vs 1744
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3351 vs 2688
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3351 vs 2688

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID K180Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

534

1012

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

113

255

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1201

1726

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1201

1726

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1744

2207

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1744

2207

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2688

3351

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2688

3351

Name	NVIDIA GRID K180Q	NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
PassMark - G3D Mark	534	1012
PassMark - G2D Mark	113	255
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1201	1726
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1201	1726
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1744	2207
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1744	2207
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2688	3351
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2688	3351
Geekbench - OpenCL		2860
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		8.142
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		262.321
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		0.741
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		16.571
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		18.406

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GRID K180Q	NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler
Code name	GK107	GK107
Launch date	28 June 2013	1 June 2012
Launch price (MSRP)	$125	$265.27
Place in performance rating	1250	1252
Type	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Price now		$149.95
Value for money (0-100)		8.53
Technical info
Core clock speed	850 MHz	745 MHz
Floating-point performance	326.4 gflops	572.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	192	384
Texture fill rate	13.6 GTexel / s	23.84 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	130 Watt	55 Watt
Transistor count	1,270 million	1,270 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	28.51 GB / s	28.8 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1782 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	DDR3
Shared memory		0