NVIDIA GRID K180Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID K180Q and NVIDIA Quadro K2000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K180Q

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • Around 14% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 745 MHz
Launch date 28 June 2013 vs 1 June 2012
Core clock speed 850 MHz vs 745 MHz

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

  • Around 75% higher texture fill rate: 23.84 GTexel / s vs 13.6 GTexel / s
  • 2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
  • Around 75% better floating-point performance: 572.2 gflops vs 326.4 gflops
  • 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 130 Watt
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
  • Around 1% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1782 MHz
  • Around 90% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1013 vs 534
  • 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 256 vs 113
  • Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1726 vs 1201
  • Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1726 vs 1201
  • Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2207 vs 1744
  • Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2207 vs 1744
  • Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 2688
  • Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 2688
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 23.84 GTexel / s vs 13.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines 384 vs 192
Floating-point performance 572.2 gflops vs 326.4 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 55 Watt vs 130 Watt
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz vs 1782 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1013 vs 534
PassMark - G2D Mark 256 vs 113
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1726 vs 1201
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1726 vs 1201
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2207 vs 1744
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2207 vs 1744
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3351 vs 2688
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3351 vs 2688

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID K180Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
534
1013
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
113
256
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1201
1726
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1201
1726
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1744
2207
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1744
2207
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2688
3351
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2688
3351
Name NVIDIA GRID K180Q NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
PassMark - G3D Mark 534 1013
PassMark - G2D Mark 113 256
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1201 1726
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1201 1726
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1744 2207
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1744 2207
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2688 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2688 3351
Geekbench - OpenCL 3061
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 8.142
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 262.321
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.741
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 16.571
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 18.406

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GRID K180Q NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

Essentials

Architecture Kepler Kepler
Code name GK107 GK107
Launch date 28 June 2013 1 June 2012
Launch price (MSRP) $125 $265.27
Place in performance rating 1257 1258
Type Workstation Mobile workstation
Price now $149.95
Value for money (0-100) 8.53

Technical info

Core clock speed 850 MHz 745 MHz
Floating-point performance 326.4 gflops 572.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 192 384
Texture fill rate 13.6 GTexel / s 23.84 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 130 Watt 55 Watt
Transistor count 1,270 million 1,270 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 MXM-A (3.0)
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 28.51 GB / s 28.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1782 MHz 1800 MHz
Memory type DDR3 DDR3
Shared memory 0