NVIDIA GRID K180Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID K180Q and NVIDIA Quadro K2000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K180Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 745 MHz
Launch date | 28 June 2013 vs 1 June 2012 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 745 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
- Around 75% higher texture fill rate: 23.84 GTexel / s vs 13.6 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
- Around 75% better floating-point performance: 572.2 gflops vs 326.4 gflops
- 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 130 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 1% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1782 MHz
- Around 89% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1011 vs 534
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 256 vs 113
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1726 vs 1201
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1726 vs 1201
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2207 vs 1744
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2207 vs 1744
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 2688
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 2688
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 23.84 GTexel / s vs 13.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 192 |
Floating-point performance | 572.2 gflops vs 326.4 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt vs 130 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1782 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1011 vs 534 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 256 vs 113 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1726 vs 1201 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1726 vs 1201 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2207 vs 1744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2207 vs 1744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 2688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 2688 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID K180Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GRID K180Q | NVIDIA Quadro K2000M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 534 | 1011 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 113 | 256 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1201 | 1726 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1201 | 1726 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1744 | 2207 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1744 | 2207 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2688 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2688 | 3351 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3076 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.142 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 262.321 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.741 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 16.571 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 18.406 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GRID K180Q | NVIDIA Quadro K2000M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Code name | GK107 | GK107 |
Launch date | 28 June 2013 | 1 June 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $125 | $265.27 |
Place in performance rating | 1257 | 1258 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Price now | $149.95 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 8.53 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 745 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | 572.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 192 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 13.6 GTexel / s | 23.84 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 55 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,270 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 |