NVIDIA GRID K2 vs NVIDIA Quadro4 980 XGL
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID K2 and NVIDIA Quadro4 980 XGL videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K2
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 745 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 123.1x more texture fill rate: 2x 95.36 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 2.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 150 nm
- 64x more maximum memory size: 2x 4 GB vs 128 MB
- 7.7x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 547.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2737 vs 5
- Around 76% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 319 vs 181
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 May 2013 vs 12 November 2002 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 2x 95.36 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 2.4 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 150 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2x 4 GB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2737 vs 5 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 319 vs 181 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID K2
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro4 980 XGL
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GRID K2 | NVIDIA Quadro4 980 XGL |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2737 | 5 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 319 | 181 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10511 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.948 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 968.568 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.58 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.988 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 114.144 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6371 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 344 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 312 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6371 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 344 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 312 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GRID K2 | NVIDIA Quadro4 980 XGL | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Kelvin |
Code name | GK104 | NV28 A2 |
Launch date | 11 May 2013 | 12 November 2002 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $5,199 | |
Place in performance rating | 970 | 967 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 300 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2x 2,289 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 150 nm |
Pipelines | 2x 1536 | |
Texture fill rate | 2x 95.36 GTexel / s billion / sec | 2.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 36 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 8.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 1.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 4 GB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 2x 160.0 GB / s | 10.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2x 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 650 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR |