NVIDIA GRID K2 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID K2 and NVIDIA Quadro K2000D videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K2

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
• 9.7x more texture fill rate: 2x 95.36 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 30.53 GTexel / s
• 8x more pipelines: 2x 1536 vs 384
• 6.2x better floating-point performance: 2x 2,289 gflops vs 732.7 gflops
• 4x more maximum memory size: 2x 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 4000 MHz
• Around 73% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2737 vs 1586
• 2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10550 vs 3973
• Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.948 vs 14.283
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 968.568 vs 386.006
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.58 vs 1.018
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32.988 vs 15.605
• 3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 114.144 vs 31.155
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6371 vs 2646
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6371 vs 2646

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

• Around 28% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 745 MHz
• 4.4x lower typical power consumption: 51 Watt vs 225 Watt
• Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 406 vs 319
• 10.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3493 vs 344
• 10.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3339 vs 312
• 10.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3493 vs 344
• 10.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3339 vs 312

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID K2
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2737 1586
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	319 406
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	10550 3973
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18.948 14.283
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	968.568 386.006
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.58 1.018
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	32.988 15.605
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	114.144 31.155
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6371 2646
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	344 3493
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	312 3339
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6371 2646
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	344 3493
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	312 3339

Compare specifications (specs)