NVIDIA GRID K2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID K2 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K2

• 7.5x more texture fill rate: 2x 95.36 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 39.55 GTexel / s
• 5.3x more pipelines: 2x 1536 vs 576
• 4.8x better floating-point performance: 2x 2,289 gflops vs 949.2 gflops
• 8x more maximum memory size: 2x 4 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 4000 MHz
• Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2737 vs 1875
• Around 99% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10532 vs 5289
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.948 vs 13.806
• Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 968.568 vs 546.51
• Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.58 vs 1.535
• Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32.988 vs 27.524
• 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 114.144 vs 38.664
• 4.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6371 vs 1435
• 4.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6371 vs 1435

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM

• Around 11% higher core clock speed: 824 MHz vs 745 MHz
• 3.5x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 225 Watt
• Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 430 vs 319
• 10.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3531 vs 344
• 10.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3300 vs 312
• 10.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3531 vs 344
• 10.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3300 vs 312

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID K2
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2737 1875
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	319 430
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	10532 5289
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18.948 13.806
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	968.568 546.51
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.58 1.535
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	32.988 27.524
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	114.144 38.664
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6371 1435
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	344 3531
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	312 3300
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6371 1435
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	344 3531
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	312 3300

Compare specifications (specs)