AMD FirePro W4100 vs NVIDIA GRID K2

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W4100 and NVIDIA GRID K2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W4100

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• 4.5x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 225 Watt
• Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 454 vs 319
• 9.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3399 vs 344
• 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1620 vs 312
• 9.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3399 vs 344
• 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1620 vs 312

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K2

• Around 18% higher core clock speed: 745 MHz vs 630 MHz
• 14.7x more texture fill rate: 2x 95.36 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 20.16 GTexel / s
• 6x more pipelines: 2x 1536 vs 512
• 7.1x better floating-point performance: 2x 2,289 gflops vs 645.1 gflops
• 4x more maximum memory size: 2x 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 4000 MHz
• Around 81% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2737 vs 1512
• Around 92% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10532 vs 5489
• Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.948 vs 15.65
• Around 80% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 968.568 vs 538.848
• Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.58 vs 1.63
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32.988 vs 31.533
• Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 114.144 vs 75.309
• 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6371 vs 1951
• 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6371 vs 1951

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD FirePro W4100
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID K2

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1512 2737
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	454 319
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5489 10532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.65 18.948
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	538.848 968.568
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.63 2.58
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.533 32.988
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	75.309 114.144
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1951 6371
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3399 344
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1620 312
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1951 6371
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3399 344
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1620 312

Compare specifications (specs)