NVIDIA GRID K220Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID K220Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K220Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 6% higher core clock speed: 745 MHz vs 700 MHz
- 2.3x more texture fill rate: 95.36 GTexel / s vs 42 billion / sec
- 3.2x more pipelines: 1536 vs 480
- Around 70% better floating-point performance: 2,289 gflops vs 1,345.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 225 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 2.7x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1848 MHz (3696 data rate)
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 539 vs 445
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 July 2014 vs 26 March 2010 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz vs 700 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 GTexel / s vs 42 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 480 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops vs 1,345.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 1848 MHz (3696 data rate) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 539 vs 445 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480
- 3x more maximum memory size: 1536 MB vs 512 MB
- 4.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4107 vs 912
- 6.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5110 vs 833
- 6.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5110 vs 833
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3658 vs 2128
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3658 vs 2128
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3320 vs 2660
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3320 vs 2660
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum memory size | 1536 MB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4107 vs 912 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5110 vs 833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5110 vs 833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3658 vs 2128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3658 vs 2128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3320 vs 2660 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3320 vs 2660 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID K220Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GRID K220Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 912 | 4107 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 539 | 445 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 833 | 5110 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 833 | 5110 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2128 | 3658 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2128 | 3658 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2660 | 3320 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2660 | 3320 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13113 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.483 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 706.104 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.245 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.405 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 106.875 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GRID K220Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
Code name | GK104 | GF100 |
Launch date | 2 July 2014 | 26 March 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $469 | $499 |
Place in performance rating | 750 | 752 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Price now | $71.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 61.35 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 700 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 1,345.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 1536 | 480 |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 GTexel / s | 42 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,100 million |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Two Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way, 3-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 1536 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | 177.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1848 MHz (3696 data rate) |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
SLI |