NVIDIA GRID M3-3020 vs AMD Radeon HD 7570
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID M3-3020 and AMD Radeon HD 7570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID M3-3020
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 59% higher core clock speed: 1033 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 3.3x more texture fill rate: 52.24 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 640 vs 480
- 2.7x better floating-point performance: 1,672 gflops vs 624 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 3.3x more memory clock speed: 5200 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 8.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 41.997 vs 4.874
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 726.846 vs 259.769
- 7.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.442 vs 0.487
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.991 vs 14.033
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 155.196 vs 57.396
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 May 2016 vs 5 January 2012 |
| Core clock speed | 1033 MHz vs 650 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 52.24 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 480 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,672 gflops vs 624 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.997 vs 4.874 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 726.846 vs 259.769 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.442 vs 0.487 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.991 vs 14.033 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 155.196 vs 57.396 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID M3-3020
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7570
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GRID M3-3020 | AMD Radeon HD 7570 |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.997 | 4.874 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 726.846 | 259.769 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.442 | 0.487 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.991 | 14.033 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 155.196 | 57.396 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 611 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 257 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1548 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1389 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2724 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1389 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2724 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GRID M3-3020 | AMD Radeon HD 7570 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | GM107 | Turks |
| Launch date | 18 May 2016 | 5 January 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 1244 | 1247 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1306 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1033 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,672 gflops | 624 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 480 |
| Texture fill rate | 52.24 GTexel / s | 15.6 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 716 million |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB / s | 64 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GRID M3-3020 with others
NVIDIAGRID M3-3020 vs
ATIRadeon 9200 LE
NVIDIAGRID M3-3020 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7570
NVIDIAGRID M3-3020 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 705M
NVIDIAGRID M3-3020 vs
AMDRadeon R7 240
NVIDIAGRID M3-3020 vs
IntelHD Graphics 630
NVIDIAGRID M3-3020 vs
AMDRadeon 620
