NVIDIA GRID M3-3020 vs AMD Radeon R7 240
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID M3-3020 and AMD Radeon R7 240 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID M3-3020
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 67% higher boost clock speed: 1306 MHz vs 780 MHz
- 3.3x more texture fill rate: 52.24 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 640 vs 320
- 3.3x better floating-point performance: 1,672 gflops vs 499.2 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 4.5x more memory clock speed: 5200 MHz vs 1150 MHz
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 41.997 vs 13.344
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 726.846 vs 290.632
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.442 vs 1.262
- Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.991 vs 21.59
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 155.196 vs 60.326
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 May 2016 vs 8 October 2013 |
| Boost clock speed | 1306 MHz vs 780 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 52.24 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 320 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,672 gflops vs 499.2 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz vs 1150 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.997 vs 13.344 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 726.846 vs 290.632 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.442 vs 1.262 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.991 vs 21.59 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 155.196 vs 60.326 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID M3-3020
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 240
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GRID M3-3020 | AMD Radeon R7 240 |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.997 | 13.344 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 726.846 | 290.632 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.442 | 1.262 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.991 | 21.59 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 155.196 | 60.326 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 896 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 272 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5175 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1688 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2342 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1688 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2342 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GRID M3-3020 | AMD Radeon R7 240 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GM107 | Oland |
| Launch date | 18 May 2016 | 8 October 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 1244 | 1245 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $69 | |
| Price now | $49.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 24.92 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1306 MHz | 780 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1033 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,672 gflops | 499.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 320 |
| Texture fill rate | 52.24 GTexel / s | 15.6 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,040 million |
| Stream Processors | 320 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Length | 267 mm | 168 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | N / A |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB / s | 72 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GRID M3-3020 with others
NVIDIAGRID M3-3020 vs
ATIRadeon 9200 LE
NVIDIAGRID M3-3020 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7570
NVIDIAGRID M3-3020 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 705M
NVIDIAGRID M3-3020 vs
AMDRadeon R7 240
NVIDIAGRID M3-3020 vs
IntelHD Graphics 630
NVIDIAGRID M3-3020 vs
AMDRadeon 620
