NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs ATI Radeon Xpress 1150 IGP
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 210 and ATI Radeon Xpress 1150 IGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 210
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 3.5x more core clock speed: 1402 MHz vs 400 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 110 nm
- 4.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 126 vs 30
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 October 2009 vs 17 October 2007 |
Core clock speed | 1402 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 110 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 126 vs 30 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon Xpress 1150 IGP
- 6.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 192 vs 30
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 192 vs 30 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 210
GPU 2: ATI Radeon Xpress 1150 IGP
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 210 | ATI Radeon Xpress 1150 IGP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 126 | 30 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 30 | 192 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2438 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 497 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 497 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 688 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 688 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 210 | ATI Radeon Xpress 1150 IGP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Rage 9 |
Code name | GT218 | RS482 |
Launch date | 12 October 2009 | 17 October 2007 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $29.49 | |
Place in performance rating | 1674 | 939 |
Price now | $32.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 6.81 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1402 MHz | 400 MHz |
CUDA cores | 16 | |
Floating-point performance | 39.36 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 110 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Pipelines | 16 | |
Texture fill rate | 4.16 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30.5 Watt | |
Transistor count | 260 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA, DVIVGADisplayPort | No outputs |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 2.731" (6.9 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 6.60" (16.8 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 9.0 |
OpenGL | 3.1 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 8.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 500 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR2 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA |