NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8500 GT

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 210 and NVIDIA GeForce 8500 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 210

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
  • 3.1x more core clock speed: 1402 MHz vs 459 MHz
  • Around 16% higher texture fill rate: 4.16 GTexel / s vs 3.6 billion / sec
  • Around 34% better floating-point performance: 39.36 gflops vs 29.376 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 80 nm
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 256 MB
Launch date 12 October 2009 vs 17 April 2007
Core clock speed 1402 MHz vs 459 MHz
Texture fill rate 4.16 GTexel / s vs 3.6 billion / sec
Floating-point performance 39.36 gflops vs 29.376 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm vs 80 nm
Maximum memory size 512 MB vs 256 MB

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8500 GT

  • Around 3% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 30.5 Watt
  • Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 800 MHz vs 500 MHz
  • Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 139 vs 115
  • Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 33 vs 31
  • Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 996 vs 688
  • Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 996 vs 688
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 30 Watt vs 30.5 Watt
Memory clock speed 800 MHz vs 500 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 139 vs 115
PassMark - G2D Mark 33 vs 31
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 996 vs 688
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 996 vs 688

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 210
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8500 GT

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
115
139
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
31
33
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
688
996
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
688
996
Name NVIDIA GeForce 210 NVIDIA GeForce 8500 GT
PassMark - G3D Mark 115 139
PassMark - G2D Mark 31 33
Geekbench - OpenCL 2438
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 497
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 497
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 688 996
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 688 996

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce 210 NVIDIA GeForce 8500 GT

Essentials

Architecture Tesla 2.0 Tesla
Code name GT218 G86
Launch date 12 October 2009 17 April 2007
Launch price (MSRP) $29.49 $129
Place in performance rating 1661 1657
Price now $32.99
Type Desktop Desktop
Value for money (0-100) 6.81

Technical info

Core clock speed 1402 MHz 459 MHz
CUDA cores 16
Floating-point performance 39.36 gflops 29.376 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 80 nm
Maximum GPU temperature 105 °C
Pipelines 16 16
Texture fill rate 4.16 GTexel / s 3.6 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 30.5 Watt 30 Watt
Transistor count 260 million 210 million

Video outputs and ports

Audio input for HDMI Internal
Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA, DVIVGADisplayPort 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI-E 2.0
Height 2.731" (6.9 cm)
Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 1.0 x16
Length 6.60" (16.8 cm) 229 mm
Supplementary power connectors None None

API support

DirectX 10.1 10.0
OpenGL 3.1 2.1

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 256 MB
Memory bandwidth 8.0 GB / s 12.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 500 MHz 800 MHz
Memory type GDDR2 GDDR3
Standard memory config per GPU 256 MB

Technologies

CUDA
SLI