NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce 9400M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 2% higher core clock speed: 589 MHz vs 580 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 140 vs 101
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 November 2009 vs 15 October 2008 |
Core clock speed | 589 MHz vs 580 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 140 vs 101 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9400M
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 31 Watt
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 55 vs 41
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1117 vs 1052
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1117 vs 1052
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12 Watt vs 31 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 55 vs 41 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1117 vs 1052 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1117 vs 1052 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9400M
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce 9400M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 41 | 55 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 140 | 101 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2724 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1052 | 1117 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1052 | 1117 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.537 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce 9400M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GT218 | C79MX |
Launch date | 27 November 2009 | 15 October 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1645 | 1643 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 589 MHz | 580 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 44.86 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 16 | |
Texture fill rate | 4.71 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 31 Watt | 12 Watt |
Transistor count | 260 million | 314 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 5.33 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 666 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR2 |