NVIDIA GeForce 310M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 310M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 310M
- Around 64% lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 23 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt vs 23 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M
- Around 84% higher texture fill rate: 9.2 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
- 3x more pipelines: 48 vs 16
- 2.5x better floating-point performance: 121.44 gflops vs 48.96 gflops
- Around 81% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 219 vs 121
- Around 91% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 42 vs 22
- Around 78% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5251 vs 2949
- Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1903 vs 1167
- Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1903 vs 1167
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 9.2 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 48 vs 16 |
Floating-point performance | 121.44 gflops vs 48.96 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 219 vs 121 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 42 vs 22 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5251 vs 2949 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1903 vs 1167 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1903 vs 1167 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 310M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 310M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 121 | 219 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 22 | 42 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2949 | 5251 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1167 | 1903 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1167 | 1903 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 310M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | GT218 | GT216 |
Launch date | 10 January 2010 | 10 January 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1673 | 1574 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | |
CUDA cores | 16 | 48 |
Floating-point performance | 48.96 gflops | 121.44 gflops |
Gigaflops | 73 | 182 |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 16 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 5 GTexel / s | 9.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt | 23 Watt |
Transistor count | 260 million | 486 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | DisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVI | HDMIDual Link DVISingle Link DVIVGADisplayPort |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | PCI-E 2.0 |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Memory bandwidth | 12.64 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR3, DDR3 | GDDR2, GDDR3, DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
Power management | 8.0 | 8.0 |
SLI |