NVIDIA GeForce 310M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 310M and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 310M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- 2.8x more core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 540 MHz
- Around 16% higher texture fill rate: 5 GTexel / s vs 4.32 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 16 vs 8
- 2.4x better floating-point performance: 48.96 gflops vs 20.8 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 64% lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 23 Watt
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 124 vs 111
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1167 vs 494
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1167 vs 494
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 January 2010 vs 7 May 2009 |
| Core clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 540 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 5 GTexel / s vs 4.32 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 16 vs 8 |
| Floating-point performance | 48.96 gflops vs 20.8 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt vs 23 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 124 vs 111 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1167 vs 494 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1167 vs 494 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
- Around 95% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 43 vs 22
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 43 vs 22 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 310M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce 310M | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 124 | 111 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 22 | 43 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2949 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1167 | 494 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1167 | 494 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce 310M | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla |
| Code name | GT218 | G98 |
| Launch date | 10 January 2010 | 7 May 2009 |
| Place in performance rating | 1673 | 1676 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $54.50 | |
| Price now | $49.75 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 2.51 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | 540 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 16 | |
| Floating-point performance | 48.96 gflops | 20.8 gflops |
| Gigaflops | 73 | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 16 | 8 |
| Texture fill rate | 5 GTexel / s | 4.32 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt | 23 Watt |
| Transistor count | 260 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | DisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVI | 2x DisplayPort |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Length | 168 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bandwidth | 12.64 GB / s | 11.12 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory type | GDDR3, DDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | |
| Memory clock speed | 1390 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| HybridPower | ||
| Power management | 8.0 | |

