NVIDIA GeForce 310M vs ATI Radeon 7500
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 310M and ATI Radeon 7500 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 310M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 5.3x more core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 290 MHz
- 2.9x more texture fill rate: 5 GTexel / s vs 1.74 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 150 nm
- Around 64% lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 23 Watt
- 38.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 116 vs 3
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 January 2010 vs 14 August 2001 |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 290 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 5 GTexel / s vs 1.74 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 150 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt vs 23 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 116 vs 3 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon 7500
- Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 35 vs 22
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 35 vs 22 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 310M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon 7500
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 310M | ATI Radeon 7500 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 116 | 3 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 22 | 35 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2949 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1167 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1167 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 310M | ATI Radeon 7500 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Rage 7 |
Code name | GT218 | RV200 |
Launch date | 10 January 2010 | 14 August 2001 |
Place in performance rating | 1672 | 1670 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | 290 MHz |
CUDA cores | 16 | |
Floating-point performance | 48.96 gflops | |
Gigaflops | 73 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 150 nm |
Pipelines | 16 | |
Texture fill rate | 5 GTexel / s | 1.74 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt | 23 Watt |
Transistor count | 260 million | 60 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | DisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVI | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | AGP 4x |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 8.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 1.3 |
Memory |
||
Memory bandwidth | 12.64 GB / s | 7.36 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR3, DDR3 | DDR |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 64 MB | |
Memory clock speed | 460 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
Power management | 8.0 |