NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4570
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 40% higher texture fill rate: 7.6 GTexel / s vs 5.44 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 50 vs 20
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 156 vs 143
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 22 February 2011 vs 9 January 2009 |
Texture fill rate | 7.6 GTexel / s vs 5.44 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 50 vs 20 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 156 vs 143 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4570
- Around 15% higher core clock speed: 680 MHz vs 589 MHz
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 80 vs 48
- Around 3% better floating-point performance: 108.8 gflops vs 105.6 gflops
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1697 vs 1062
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1697 vs 1062
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 680 MHz vs 589 MHz |
Pipelines | 80 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 108.8 gflops vs 105.6 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1697 vs 1062 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1697 vs 1062 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4570
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4570 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 50 | 20 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 156 | 143 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4683 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1062 | 1697 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1062 | 1697 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4570 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | GT218 | M92 |
Launch date | 22 February 2011 | 9 January 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1629 | 1632 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 589 MHz | 680 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 105.6 gflops | 108.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 80 |
Texture fill rate | 7.6 GTexel / s | 5.44 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | |
Transistor count | 260 million | 242 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-II |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 12.64 GB / s | 12.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3, DDR2, DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
1x Dual-Link/Single-Link DVI | ||
1x Single-Link DVI Support (all display ports have to be supported by the laptop manufacturer) | ||
DisplayPort support up to 2560x1600 | ||
HDMI support up to 1920x1080 (both with 7.1 AC3 Audio) | ||
PCI-E 2.0 x16 | ||
Powerplay |