NVIDIA GeForce 315M vs Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 315M and Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 315M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
  • 3x more core clock speed: 1212 MHz vs 400 MHz
  • 4x more pipelines: 16 vs 4
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 45 nm
  • 19.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 115 vs 6
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 5 January 2011 vs 1 May 2010
Core clock speed 1212 MHz vs 400 MHz
Pipelines 16 vs 4
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm vs 45 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 115 vs 6

Reasons to consider the Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600

  • Around 61% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 58 vs 36
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 58 vs 36

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 315M
GPU 2: Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
115
6
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
36
58
Name NVIDIA GeForce 315M Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600
PassMark - G3D Mark 115 6
PassMark - G2D Mark 36 58
Geekbench - OpenCL 2910
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1401
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1401

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce 315M Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600

Essentials

Architecture Tesla 2.0 PowerVR SGX5
Code name GT218 GMA 600
Launch date 5 January 2011 1 May 2010
Place in performance rating 1636 1581
Type Laptop Laptop

Technical info

Core clock speed 1212 MHz 400 MHz
CUDA cores 16
Floating-point performance 38.78 gflops
Gigaflops 73
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 45 nm
Pipelines 16 4
Texture fill rate 4.85 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 14 Watt
Transistor count 260 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors DisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVI
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI-E 2.0
Interface PCIe 2.0 x16

API support

DirectX 10.1 9.0c
OpenGL 4.1

Memory

Memory bandwidth 12.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit
Memory type GDDR3, DDR3
Shared memory 0 yes

Technologies

CUDA
HybridPower
Power management 8.0