NVIDIA GeForce 315M vs Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 315M and Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 315M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- 3x more core clock speed: 1212 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 4x more pipelines: 16 vs 4
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 45 nm
- 19.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 115 vs 6
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 January 2011 vs 1 May 2010 |
| Core clock speed | 1212 MHz vs 400 MHz |
| Pipelines | 16 vs 4 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 45 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 115 vs 6 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600
- Around 61% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 58 vs 36
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 58 vs 36 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 315M
GPU 2: Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce 315M | Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 115 | 6 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 36 | 58 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2910 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1401 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1401 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce 315M | Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | PowerVR SGX5 |
| Code name | GT218 | GMA 600 |
| Launch date | 5 January 2011 | 1 May 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 1636 | 1581 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1212 MHz | 400 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 16 | |
| Floating-point performance | 38.78 gflops | |
| Gigaflops | 73 | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 45 nm |
| Pipelines | 16 | 4 |
| Texture fill rate | 4.85 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 260 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | DisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVI | |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.1 | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 4.1 | |
Memory |
||
| Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
| Memory type | GDDR3, DDR3 | |
| Shared memory | 0 | yes |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| HybridPower | ||
| Power management | 8.0 | |

