NVIDIA GeForce 410M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 410M and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 410M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 0 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• 2.6x more core clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 450 MHz
• Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 15 Watt

Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650

• Around 96% higher texture fill rate: 9 GTexel / s vs 4.6 GTexel / s
• 8.3x more pipelines: 400 vs 48
• 3.3x better floating-point performance: 360.0 gflops vs 110.4 gflops
• Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 444 vs 267
• Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 149 vs 130
• 3.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3776 vs 1003
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 1570
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 1570

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 410M
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	267 444
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	130 149
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1003 3776
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1570 3340
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1570 3340

Compare specifications (specs)