NVIDIA GeForce 410M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 410M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 410M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 0 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 6% higher core clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1080 MHz
• 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 28 Watt
• 4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 127 vs 32

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M

• 2.3x more texture fill rate: 10.8 GTexel / s vs 4.6 GTexel / s
• Around 50% higher pipelines: 72 vs 48
• Around 41% better floating-point performance: 155.52 gflops vs 110.4 gflops
• Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 382 vs 256
• 7.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7386 vs 1032
• Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2120 vs 1570
• Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2120 vs 1570

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 410M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	256 382
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	127 32
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1032 7386
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1570 2120
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1570 2120

Compare specifications (specs)