NVIDIA GeForce 410M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 410M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 410M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 0 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 6% higher core clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1080 MHz
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 28 Watt
- 4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 127 vs 32
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 January 2011 vs 7 January 2010 |
Core clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 1080 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12 Watt vs 28 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 127 vs 32 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M
- 2.3x more texture fill rate: 10.8 GTexel / s vs 4.6 GTexel / s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 72 vs 48
- Around 41% better floating-point performance: 155.52 gflops vs 110.4 gflops
- Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 382 vs 258
- 7.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7386 vs 1032
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2120 vs 1570
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2120 vs 1570
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 10.8 GTexel / s vs 4.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 72 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 155.52 gflops vs 110.4 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 382 vs 258 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7386 vs 1032 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2120 vs 1570 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2120 vs 1570 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 410M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 410M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 258 | 382 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 127 | 32 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1032 | 7386 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.846 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 86.519 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 7.048 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 494 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1163 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1570 | 2120 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 494 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1163 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1570 | 2120 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 410M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | GF119 | GT215 |
Launch date | 5 January 2011 | 7 January 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1562 | 1565 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1150 MHz | 1080 MHz |
CUDA cores | 48 | 72 |
Floating-point performance | 110.4 gflops | 155.52 gflops |
Gigaflops | 73 | 233 |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 72 |
Texture fill rate | 4.6 GTexel / s | 10.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12 Watt | 28 Watt |
Transistor count | 292 million | 727 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | DisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVI | Single Link DVIVGADisplayPortHDMIDual Link DVI |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | PCI-E 2.0 |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 1 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3, GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
Power management | 8.0 | 8.0 |
HybridPower | ||
MXM 3.0 Type-B | ||
PowerMizer 8.0 | ||
SLI |