AMD Radeon HD 6410D IGP vs NVIDIA GeForce 410M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6410D IGP and NVIDIA GeForce 410M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6410D IGP

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
  • 3.3x more pipelines: 160 vs 48
  • Around 29% better floating-point performance: 142.08 gflops vs 110.4 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 40 nm
Launch date 20 June 2011 vs 5 January 2011
Pipelines 160 vs 48
Floating-point performance 142.08 gflops vs 110.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 32 nm vs 40 nm

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 410M

  • 2.6x more core clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 444 MHz
  • Around 30% higher texture fill rate: 4.6 GTexel / s vs 3.55 GTexel / s
  • 5.4x lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 65 Watt
  • Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 257 vs 237
  • Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 127 vs 117
  • Around 82% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1027 vs 564
  • Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 494 vs 415
  • Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 494 vs 415
  • Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1163 vs 646
  • Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1163 vs 646
  • Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1570 vs 1468
  • Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1570 vs 1468
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1150 MHz vs 444 MHz
Texture fill rate 4.6 GTexel / s vs 3.55 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 12 Watt vs 65 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 257 vs 237
PassMark - G2D Mark 127 vs 117
Geekbench - OpenCL 1027 vs 564
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 494 vs 415
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 494 vs 415
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1163 vs 646
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1163 vs 646
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1570 vs 1468
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1570 vs 1468

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6410D IGP
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 410M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
237
257
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
117
127
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
564
1027
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
415
494
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
415
494
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
646
1163
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
646
1163
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1468
1570
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1468
1570
Name AMD Radeon HD 6410D IGP NVIDIA GeForce 410M
PassMark - G3D Mark 237 257
PassMark - G2D Mark 117 127
Geekbench - OpenCL 564 1027
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 415 494
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 415 494
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 646 1163
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 646 1163
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1468 1570
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1468 1570
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 2.846
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 86.519
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 7.048

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon HD 6410D IGP NVIDIA GeForce 410M

Essentials

Architecture TeraScale 2 Fermi 2.0
Code name WinterPark GF119
Launch date 20 June 2011 5 January 2011
Place in performance rating 1556 1557
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Core clock speed 444 MHz 1150 MHz
Floating-point performance 142.08 gflops 110.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 32 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 160 48
Texture fill rate 3.55 GTexel / s 4.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt 12 Watt
Transistor count 1,180 million 292 million
CUDA cores 48
Gigaflops 73

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs DisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVI
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface IGP PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus support PCI-E 2.0

API support

DirectX 11.2 (11_0) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.4 1

Memory

Memory type System Shared DDR3
Memory bandwidth 12.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit
Shared memory 0

Technologies

CUDA
Power management 8.0