NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 vs NVIDIA GeForce 410M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 and NVIDIA GeForce 410M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA GeForce GT 620

NVIDIA GeForce 410M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 620

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
2.4x more texture fill rate: 11.2 billion / sec vs 4.6 GTexel / s
2x more pipelines: 96 vs 48
2.4x better floating-point performance: 268.8 gflops vs 110.4 gflops
Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 383 vs 267
Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 158 vs 130
Around 57% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1571 vs 1003
Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.046 vs 2.846
2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 17.41 vs 7.048
Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 614 vs 494
Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1683 vs 1570
Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 614 vs 494
Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1683 vs 1570

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	15 May 2012 vs 5 January 2011
Texture fill rate	11.2 billion / sec vs 4.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines	96 vs 48
Floating-point performance	268.8 gflops vs 110.4 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	383 vs 267
PassMark - G2D Mark	158 vs 130
Geekbench - OpenCL	1571 vs 1003
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	4.046 vs 2.846
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	17.41 vs 7.048
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	614 vs 494
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1683 vs 1570
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	614 vs 494
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1683 vs 1570

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 410M

Around 64% higher core clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 700 MHz
4.1x lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 49 Watt
Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 86.519 vs 83.907

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1150 MHz vs 700 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	12 Watt vs 49 Watt
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	86.519 vs 83.907
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1163 vs 1162
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1163 vs 1162

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 410M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

383

267

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

158

130

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

1571

1003

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4.046

2.846

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

83.907

86.519

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

17.41

7.048

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

614

494

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1162

1163

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1683

1570

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

614

494

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1162

1163

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1683

1570

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GT 620	NVIDIA GeForce 410M
PassMark - G3D Mark	383	267
PassMark - G2D Mark	158	130
Geekbench - OpenCL	1571	1003
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	4.046	2.846
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	83.907	86.519
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.371
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	6.791
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	17.41	7.048
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	614	494
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1162	1163
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1683	1570
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	614	494
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1162	1163
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1683	1570

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GT 620	NVIDIA GeForce 410M
Essentials
Architecture	Fermi	Fermi 2.0
Code name	GF108	GF119
Launch date	15 May 2012	5 January 2011
Launch price (MSRP)	$39.99
Place in performance rating	1554	1557
Price now	$39.99
Type	Desktop	Laptop
Value for money (0-100)	13.32
Technical info
Core clock speed	700 MHz	1150 MHz
CUDA cores	96	48
Floating-point performance	268.8 gflops	110.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	40 nm
Maximum GPU temperature	98 °C
Pipelines	96	48
Texture fill rate	11.2 billion / sec	4.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	49 Watt	12 Watt
Transistor count	585 million	292 million
Gigaflops		73
Video outputs and ports
Audio input for HDMI	Internal
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI, VGA	DisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVI
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	PCI Express 2.0	PCI-E 2.0
Height	2.7" (6.9 cm)
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	5.7" (14.5 cm)
Supplementary power connectors	None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.2	1
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB / s	12.8 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1.8 GB/s
Memory type	DDR3	DDR3
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Blu-Ray
CUDA
Power management		8.0