NVIDIA GeForce 615 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 615 and NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 615

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 2% higher core clock speed: 660 MHz vs 650 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
• 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 49 Watt vs 135 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
• Around 10% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1640 MHz
• 3.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 301 vs 77

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512

• 7.9x more texture fill rate: 41.6 GTexel / s vs 5.28 GTexel / s
• 2.7x more pipelines: 128 vs 48
• 3.3x better floating-point performance: 416.0 gflops vs 126.7 gflops
• Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 568 vs 514
• Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3342 vs 1708
• Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3342 vs 1708

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 615
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	514 568
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	301 77
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1708 3342
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1708 3342

Compare specifications (specs)