NVIDIA GeForce 920M vs NVIDIA GeForce 615

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 920M and NVIDIA GeForce 615 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 920M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• Around 45% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 660 MHz
• 2.3x more texture fill rate: 12.4 GTexel / s vs 5.28 GTexel / s
• 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
• 2.3x better floating-point performance: 297.6 gflops vs 126.7 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 48% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 49 Watt
• 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 722 vs 514
• 2.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3700 vs 1322
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.358 vs 3.257
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1598 vs 668
• 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3636 vs 1286
• Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 1708
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1598 vs 668
• 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3636 vs 1286
• Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 1708

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 615

• 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 301 vs 118

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 920M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 615

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	722 514
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	118 301
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3700 1322
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.358 3.257
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1598 668
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3636 1286
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 1708
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1598 668
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3636 1286
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 1708

Compare specifications (specs)