NVIDIA GeForce 920M vs NVIDIA GeForce 615

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 920M and NVIDIA GeForce 615 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 920M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
  • Around 45% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 660 MHz
  • 2.3x more texture fill rate: 12.4 GTexel / s vs 5.28 GTexel / s
  • 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
  • 2.3x better floating-point performance: 297.6 gflops vs 126.7 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • Around 48% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 49 Watt
  • 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
  • Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 721 vs 514
  • 2.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3697 vs 1322
  • 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.358 vs 3.257
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1598 vs 668
  • 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3636 vs 1286
  • Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 1708
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1598 vs 668
  • 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3636 vs 1286
  • Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 1708
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 13 March 2015 vs 15 May 2012
Core clock speed 954 MHz vs 660 MHz
Texture fill rate 12.4 GTexel / s vs 5.28 GTexel / s
Pipelines 384 vs 48
Floating-point performance 297.6 gflops vs 126.7 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 33 Watt vs 49 Watt
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 1 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 721 vs 514
Geekbench - OpenCL 3697 vs 1322
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 8.358 vs 3.257
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1598 vs 668
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3636 vs 1286
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 vs 1708
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1598 vs 668
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3636 vs 1286
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358 vs 1708

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 615

  • 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 301 vs 118
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 301 vs 118

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 920M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 615

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
721
514
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
118
301
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
3697
1322
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8.358
3.257
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1598
668
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3636
1286
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
1708
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1598
668
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3636
1286
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
1708
Name NVIDIA GeForce 920M NVIDIA GeForce 615
PassMark - G3D Mark 721 514
PassMark - G2D Mark 118 301
Geekbench - OpenCL 3697 1322
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 8.358 3.257
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 157.606
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.843
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 15.374
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 40.443
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1598 668
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3636 1286
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 1708
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1598 668
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3636 1286
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358 1708
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 326

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce 920M NVIDIA GeForce 615

Essentials

Architecture Kepler 2.0 Fermi
Code name GK208B GF108
Launch date 13 March 2015 15 May 2012
Place in performance rating 1310 1313
Type Laptop Desktop

Technical info

Core clock speed 954 MHz 660 MHz
Floating-point performance 297.6 gflops 126.7 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 384 48
Texture fill rate 12.4 GTexel / s 5.28 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 33 Watt 49 Watt
Transistor count 585 million 585 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 2.0 x16

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.6

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 14.4 GB / s 28.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz 1800 MHz
Memory type DDR3 DDR3
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
CUDA
GameWorks
GPU Boost
Optimus
Verde Drivers