NVIDIA GeForce 810A vs NVIDIA GeForce 825M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 810A and NVIDIA GeForce 825M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 810A
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 33 Watt
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 319 vs 247
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 22 July 2014 vs 27 January 2014 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 33 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 319 vs 247 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 825M
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 775 MHz
- 2.4x more texture fill rate: 30.11 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
- 2.4x better floating-point performance: 722.7 gflops vs 297.6 gflops
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 782 vs 622
- 8.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15796 vs 1828
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 775 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 30.11 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 192 |
Floating-point performance | 722.7 gflops vs 297.6 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 782 vs 622 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15796 vs 1828 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 810A
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 825M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 810A | NVIDIA GeForce 825M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 622 | 782 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 319 | 247 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1828 | 15796 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 810A | NVIDIA GeForce 825M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Kepler 2.0 |
Code name | GK208 | GK208 |
Launch date | 22 July 2014 | 27 January 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 752 | 790 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 850 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | 722.7 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 192 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 12.4 GTexel / s | 30.11 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 33 Watt |
Boost clock speed | 941 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1300 Million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 |