NVIDIA GeForce 810A vs NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 810A and NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 810A
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 35% higher core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 574 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 15x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 225 Watt
Launch date | 22 July 2014 vs 25 July 2011 |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz vs 574 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q
- 2.6x more texture fill rate: 32.1 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s
- 2.3x more pipelines: 448 vs 192
- 3.5x better floating-point performance: 1,027.7 gflops vs 297.6 gflops
- 6x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 74% higher memory clock speed: 3132 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1306 vs 622
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 444 vs 319
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 32.1 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 448 vs 192 |
Floating-point performance | 1,027.7 gflops vs 297.6 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 3132 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1306 vs 622 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 444 vs 319 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 810A
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 810A | NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 622 | 1306 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 319 | 444 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1828 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.784 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 917.512 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.125 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.227 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 93.533 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 810A | NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Fermi |
Code name | GK208 | GF100 |
Launch date | 22 July 2014 | 25 July 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 752 | 762 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $5,489 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 574 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 192 | 448 |
Texture fill rate | 12.4 GTexel / s | 32.1 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 248 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 150.3 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 3132 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |