NVIDIA GeForce 825M vs AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 825M and AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 825M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 85 Watt
Launch date | 27 January 2014 vs 21 December 2013 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 85 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM
- Around 29% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 850 MHz
- 2x more texture fill rate: 61.6 GTexel / s vs 30.11 GTexel / s
- 2.3x more pipelines: 896 vs 384
- 2.7x better floating-point performance: 1,971 gflops vs 722.7 gflops
- 3.6x more memory clock speed: 6500 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 4.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3182 vs 782
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 586 vs 247
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 850 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 61.6 GTexel / s vs 30.11 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 896 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 1,971 gflops vs 722.7 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 6500 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3182 vs 782 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 586 vs 247 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 825M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 825M | AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 782 | 3182 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 247 | 586 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15796 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 971 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 971 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1980 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1980 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 825M | AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | GK208 | Bonaire |
Launch date | 27 January 2014 | 21 December 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 790 | 573 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 941 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 722.7 gflops | 1,971 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 896 |
Texture fill rate | 30.11 GTexel / s | 61.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 85 Watt |
Transistor count | 1300 Million | 2,080 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Length | 183 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 104.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 6500 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 |