NVIDIA GeForce 825M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 825M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 825M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 110 Watt
- 360x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
- 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15796 vs 7900
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 January 2014 vs 9 October 2012 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 110 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15796 vs 7900 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 928 MHz vs 850 MHz
- Around 97% higher texture fill rate: 59.2 billion / sec vs 30.11 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
- Around 97% better floating-point performance: 1,425 gflops vs 722.7 gflops
- 3.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2527 vs 771
- Around 76% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 416 vs 236
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 928 MHz vs 850 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 59.2 billion / sec vs 30.11 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 1,425 gflops vs 722.7 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2527 vs 771 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 416 vs 236 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 825M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 825M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 771 | 2527 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 236 | 416 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15796 | 7900 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.168 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 592.345 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.141 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.29 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 47.404 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3948 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3335 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3948 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3335 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 881 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 825M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | GK208 | GK106 |
Launch date | 27 January 2014 | 9 October 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 843 | 846 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
Price now | $169.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 18.72 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 941 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 928 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 722.7 gflops | 1,425 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 768 |
Texture fill rate | 30.11 GTexel / s | 59.2 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 110 Watt |
Transistor count | 1300 Million | 2,540 million |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini... |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | One 6-pin |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 86.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5.4 GB/s |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
TXAA |