NVIDIA GeForce 825M vs NVIDIA Quadro K510M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 825M and NVIDIA Quadro K510M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 825M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- 2.2x more texture fill rate: 30.11 GTexel / s vs 13.54 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
- 2.2x better floating-point performance: 722.7 gflops vs 324.9 gflops
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 771 vs 641
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 January 2014 vs 23 July 2013 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 846 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 30.11 GTexel / s vs 13.54 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 192 |
Floating-point performance | 722.7 gflops vs 324.9 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 771 vs 641 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K510M
- Around 10% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 33 Watt
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 2400 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- Around 87% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 441 vs 236
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 33 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2400 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 441 vs 236 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 825M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K510M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 825M | NVIDIA Quadro K510M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 771 | 641 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 236 | 441 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15796 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1087 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1087 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2012 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2012 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3071 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3071 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 825M | NVIDIA Quadro K510M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Kepler 2.0 |
Code name | GK208 | GK208 |
Launch date | 27 January 2014 | 23 July 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 843 | 845 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 941 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 846 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 722.7 gflops | 324.9 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
Texture fill rate | 30.11 GTexel / s | 13.54 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 30 Watt |
Transistor count | 1300 Million | 1270 Million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 19.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 2400 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |