NVIDIA GeForce 830M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 830M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 830M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 2.7x more pipelines: 256 vs 96
- 2.5x better floating-point performance: 588.8 gflops vs 240.0 gflops
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1008 vs 497
- Around 90% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4232 vs 2229
- Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1729 vs 999
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3589 vs 2333
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 3257
- Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1729 vs 999
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3589 vs 2333
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 3257
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 12 March 2014 vs 1 October 2012 |
| Pipelines | 256 vs 96 |
| Floating-point performance | 588.8 gflops vs 240.0 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1008 vs 497 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4232 vs 2229 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1729 vs 999 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3589 vs 2333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 3257 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1729 vs 999 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3589 vs 2333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 3257 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 33 Watt
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 142 vs 137
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 33 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 142 vs 137 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 830M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce 830M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1008 | 497 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 137 | 142 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4232 | 2229 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 16.955 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 156.544 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.013 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.81 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 67.443 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1729 | 999 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3589 | 2333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3257 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1729 | 999 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3589 | 2333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3257 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce 830M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | GM108 | GF117 |
| Launch date | 12 March 2014 | 1 October 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 1218 | 1220 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1082 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 588.8 gflops | 240.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 256 | 96 |
| Texture fill rate | 18.4 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 15 Watt |
| CUDA cores | 96 | |
| Transistor count | 585 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 2.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce 830M with others
NVIDIAGeForce 830M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 645M
NVIDIAGeForce 830M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 625M
NVIDIAGeForce 830M vs
NVIDIAQuadro K2000
NVIDIAGeForce 830M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 930M
NVIDIAGeForce 830M vs
IntelHD Graphics P530
NVIDIAGeForce 830M vs
AMDRadeon R8 M350DX
