NVIDIA GeForce 830M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 830M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 830M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
  • 2.7x more pipelines: 256 vs 96
  • 2.5x better floating-point performance: 588.8 gflops vs 240.0 gflops
  • 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1008 vs 497
  • Around 90% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4232 vs 2229
  • Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1729 vs 999
  • Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3589 vs 2333
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 3257
  • Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1729 vs 999
  • Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3589 vs 2333
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 3257
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 12 March 2014 vs 1 October 2012
Pipelines 256 vs 96
Floating-point performance 588.8 gflops vs 240.0 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1008 vs 497
Geekbench - OpenCL 4232 vs 2229
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1729 vs 999
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3589 vs 2333
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3352 vs 3257
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1729 vs 999
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3589 vs 2333
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3352 vs 3257

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M

  • 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 33 Watt
  • Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 142 vs 137
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 33 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 142 vs 137

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 830M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1008
497
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
137
142
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
4232
2229
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1729
999
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3589
2333
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3352
3257
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1729
999
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3589
2333
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3352
3257
Name NVIDIA GeForce 830M NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M
PassMark - G3D Mark 1008 497
PassMark - G2D Mark 137 142
Geekbench - OpenCL 4232 2229
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 16.955
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 156.544
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.013
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 17.81
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 67.443
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1729 999
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3589 2333
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3352 3257
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1729 999
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3589 2333
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3352 3257

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce 830M NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M

Essentials

Architecture Maxwell Fermi 2.0
Code name GM108 GF117
Launch date 12 March 2014 1 October 2012
Place in performance rating 1218 1220
Type Laptop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1150 MHz
Core clock speed 1082 MHz
Floating-point performance 588.8 gflops 240.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 256 96
Texture fill rate 18.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 33 Watt 15 Watt
CUDA cores 96
Transistor count 585 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution Up to 2048x1536

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 PCI Express 2.0
Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 12 API
OpenGL 4.5 4.5
OpenCL 1.1

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz 1800 MHz
Memory type DDR3 DDR3
Shared memory 0 0

Technologies

CUDA
GameWorks
GPU Boost
Optimus
3D Blu-Ray
DirectCompute
DirectX 11 DirectX 11