NVIDIA GeForce 8400 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 8400 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8400
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 80 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 80% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 160 vs 89
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 December 2007 vs 1 June 2007 |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 80 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 160 vs 89 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 625 MHz vs 540 MHz
- 2.3x more texture fill rate: 10 GTexel / s vs 4.32 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 32 vs 8
- 3.8x better floating-point performance: 80 gflops vs 20.8 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 256 MB
- Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 231 vs 81
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz vs 540 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 10 GTexel / s vs 4.32 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 32 vs 8 |
Floating-point performance | 80 gflops vs 20.8 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 231 vs 81 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 8400
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 8400 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 81 | 231 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 160 | 89 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 733 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 733 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
Code name | G98 | G84 |
Launch date | 4 December 2007 | 1 June 2007 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $69.78 | $149.90 |
Place in performance rating | 1388 | 1391 |
Price now | $69.78 | $149.90 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 1.87 | 1.87 |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 540 MHz | 625 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 20.8 gflops | 80 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 8 | 32 |
Texture fill rate | 4.32 GTexel / s | 10 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 210 million | 289 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-HE |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 8 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | DDR2 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 |